[Sun Jun 16 16:38:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (295.5, 227.1) = 17 2 44.69 78 38 22.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 138.3 +/- 20.6
  Background counts = 130.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun Jun 16 16:38:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.18'
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.02"
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.755
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 0, mean size = 9.02"
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 6 is offset by 2.391740 and 0.604165 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.036386 x 6.592782, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source is confused with source 7
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source is confused with source 39
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.02 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.02"
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.755
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 1 for pass 1, mean size = 9.02"
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src1.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1678.200000, observed total counts = 1330.000000
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00