[Sun Jun 16 16:38:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (299.1, 225.7) = 17 2 39.36 78 38 26.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 60.7 +/- 14.3
  Background counts = 107.6
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun 16 16:38:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.27'
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.06"
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.861
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 35 for pass 0, mean size = 9.06"
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src35.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 39 is offset by -6.898570 and -2.260549 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.002046 x 1.002046, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 39 is offset by -1.383345 and 5.382323 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.146340 x 1.146340, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 39 is offset by -1.284896 and 5.164003 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.329251 x 2.548423, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source is confused with source 6
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.06"
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.861
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 1, mean size = 9.06"
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source 39 is offset by -6.898570 and -2.260549 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.002046 x 1.002046, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source 39 is offset by -1.429660 and 5.210417 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.041903 x 2.150754, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00