[Sun Jun 16 16:38:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.3, 232.8) = 17 3 5.54 78 38 56.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 132.6 +/- 19.4
  Background counts = 152.9
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun Jun 16 16:38:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.92'
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.89"
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.966
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 8.89"
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 2131.430000, observed total counts = 1673.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source is confused with source 37
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.89"
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.966
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 8.89"
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00