[Sun Jun 16 16:38:31 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (277.6, 243.6) = 17 3 11.12 78 39 31.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 138.3 +/- 19.6 Background counts = 160.8 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.001 [Sun Jun 16 16:38:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.26' [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.56" [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.821 [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 8.56" [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 27 is offset by -1.459132 and 2.384290 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.021968 x 1.021968, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 23 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 27 is offset by 0.033751 and 1.181049 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.967274 x 0.967274, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 27 is offset by 0.163015 and 4.828888 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.266469 x 1.266469, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source is confused with source 2 [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.56" [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.821 [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 8.56" [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 2 [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00