[Sun Jun 16 16:38:31 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (264.1, 248.8) = 17 3 31.02 78 39 51.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 107.8 +/- 17.7 Background counts = 163.1 Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001 [Sun Jun 16 16:38:32 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.37' [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.62" [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.772 [Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 8.62" [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:04 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 00:38:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 23 is offset by -6.440383 and 3.389436 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 7.868322 x 1.123825, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Warning, spatial fit 14 centroid is now closest to src. 17 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source 23 is offset by -0.302705 and 2.502162 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.768055 x 1.768055, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 17 00:39:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.62" [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.772 [Mon Jun 17 06:27:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 8.62" [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv [Mon Jun 17 09:12:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Warning, spatial fit 14 centroid is now closest to src. 32 [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jun 17 09:12:58 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00