[Sun Jun 16 16:38:05 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (302.9, 236.2) = 17 2 33.81 78 39 6.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 86.1 +/- 18.0
  Background counts = 103.9
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun 16 16:38:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.52'
[Sun Jun 16 20:02:44 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 16 20:02:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.69"
[Sun Jun 16 20:02:44 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.962
[Sun Jun 16 20:02:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 8.69"
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Sun Jun 16 21:56:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Source is confused with source 25
[Mon Jun 17 00:38:55 2013] Source is confused with source 23
[Mon Jun 17 04:26:57 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 04:26:57 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.69"
[Mon Jun 17 04:26:57 2013] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.962
[Mon Jun 17 04:26:57 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 8.69"
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Mon Jun 17 06:27:13 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Source 27 is offset by -2.521467 and -3.418773 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.749848 x 1.003605, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Source 27 is offset by -2.443814 and -3.586543 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.901481 x 1.901481, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 09:12:44 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 10:07:35 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26302.222382, 20500.664764, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 17 10:07:35 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27_src.reg
[Mon Jun 17 10:07:35 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (265, 199) - (340, 274)
[Mon Jun 17 10:07:35 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26302.222382, 20500.664764, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24178.108673, 20384.852386, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25277.770000, 19883.151000, 1449.576042, 244.226407, 83.551850, X, Y) && !ellipse(24988.821869, 21279.964981, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23006.348000, 20770.772000, 1428.512041, 1428.512041, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24593.434906, 21621.441574, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24779.358643, 20046.438370, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23505.064056, 20306.171921, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23199.298000, 22479.900000, 1659.552048, 1659.552048, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24813.746582, 19697.300690, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24454.312000, 21938.744400, 1307.928038, 1307.928038, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25733.154022, 20673.837723, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25045.722000, 22141.074200, 2615.856075, 2615.856075, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25809.224000, 19229.104000, 2962.640085, 1261.904036, 31.714900, X, Y) && !ellipse(23552.504120, 22057.645630, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26312.134000, 18556.926000, 1481.320043, 1481.320043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25758.806915, 22049.441589, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24352.530823, 22593.982788, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 17 10:07:35 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0141380201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src27.gif