[Sun Jun 17 10:16:01 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (294.5, 281.9) = 9 9 29.54 -9 43 2.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 106.8 +/- 17.1
  Background counts = 129.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sun Jun 17 10:16:01 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.23'
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.04"
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.668
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 0, mean size = 7.04"
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 67 centroid is now closest to src. 77
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2102.260000, observed total counts = 1835.000000
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 73
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.04"
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.668
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 1, mean size = 7.04"
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Warning, spatial fit 50 centroid is now closest to src. 65
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9