[Sun Jun 17 10:16:00 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.5, 247.3) = 9 9 27.48 -9 45 27.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.4 +/- 14.8
  Background counts = 65.9
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun 17 10:16:01 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.71'
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.28"
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.605
[Sun Jun 17 10:19:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 0, mean size = 8.28"
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:11 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Sun Jun 17 13:59:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Source 37 is offset by -0.557026 and 6.935093 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.952294 x 0.952294, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 17 19:42:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.28"
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 14, frac = 0.605
[Sun Jun 17 19:43:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 8.28"
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Sun Jun 17 22:04:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136740101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 955.466000, observed total counts = 705.000000
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 37
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 18 01:35:44 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0