[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (284.0, 228.0) = 11 4 25.56 38 7 36.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 136.3 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 66.6
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.21'
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.318
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 0, mean size = 9.04"
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source 44 is offset by -4.986360 and 1.999697 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.001361 x 1.001361, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 43 centroid is now closest to src. 40
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source is confused with source 42
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.04 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.04"
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.318
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 1, mean size = 9.04"
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1378.210000, observed total counts = 1225.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 44
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1443.490000, observed total counts = 1146.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 44
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Warning: source 34 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 44 at 45.000711 pixels away
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 44 at 33.728630 pixels away
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9