[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (281.3, 233.7) = 11 4 26.55 38 8 5.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 145.1 +/- 16.4
  Background counts = 72.1
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.85'
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86"
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.855
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 0, mean size = 8.86"
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 41 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source 42 is offset by 5.846799 and 2.201403 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.063080 x 1.063080, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source is confused with source 44
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.86"
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.855
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 1, mean size = 8.86"
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Warning, spatial fit 32 centroid is now closest to src. 44
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9