[Tue Jul 10 22:00:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (256.3, 249.0) = 11 4 35.80 38 9 6.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 112.1 +/- 17.0
  Background counts = 49.8
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.71'
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78"
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.142
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 8.78"
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1574.960000, observed total counts = 1166.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 35
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 34 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source is confused with source 40
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.78"
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 29, frac = 1.142
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 1, mean size = 8.78"
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1809.930000, observed total counts = 1166.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 35
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source 35 is offset by 5.981490 and 5.862146 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.145297 x 2.145297, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9