[Tue Jul 10 22:00:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.9, 275.2) = 11 4 11.58 38 11 2.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 95.3 +/- 16.1
  Background counts = 108.5
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.39'
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.640
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 7.63"
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source 25 is offset by -7.027035 and -0.248018 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.012322 x 7.012322, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.63"
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.640
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 7.63"
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 25 at 15.731330 pixels away
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = -101.673000, observed total counts = 1576.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9