[Tue Jul 10 22:00:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (233.3, 275.4) = 11 4 44.29 38 11 0.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 120.8 +/- 16.4
  Background counts = 63.1
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.01'
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93"
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.575
[Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 8.93"
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1031.600000, observed total counts = 916.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 27
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1333.250000, observed total counts = 1175.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source is confused with source 27
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.93"
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.575
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 8.93"
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 24 at 12.229622 pixels away
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1505.190000, observed total counts = 1175.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9