[Tue Jul 10 22:00:53 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (331.7, 297.9) = 11 4 7.96 38 12 38.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 112.2 +/- 18.3 Background counts = 90.4 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.41' [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.64" [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.983 [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 7.64" [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source 19 is offset by 4.656050 and 0.185930 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 0.877674 x 0.877674, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.64" [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.983 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 7.64" [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source 19 is offset by 4.888734 and -0.352712 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.194326 x 7.021380, not incorporating fit results [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9