[Tue Jul 10 22:00:53 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (469.4, 312.0) = 11 3 17.13 38 13 39.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 87.9 +/- 12.7 Background counts = 10.1 Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001 [Tue Jul 10 22:00:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.43' [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.65" [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.905 [Tue Jul 10 22:05:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 12.65" [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv [Wed Jul 11 01:21:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 13.046143 pixels away [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 11 09:14:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.65 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.65" [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.905 [Wed Jul 11 09:14:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 12.65" [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:09:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Warning: source 12 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 12.605162 pixels away [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 11 23:21:11 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8