[Tue Jul 10 22:01:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (373.4, 170.2) = 11 3 52.62 38 3 22.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 79.5 +/- 13.1
  Background counts = 8.8
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jul 10 22:01:46 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.77'
[Wed Jul 11 04:11:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 04:11:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.81"
[Wed Jul 11 04:11:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.798
[Wed Jul 11 04:11:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 0, mean size = 11.81"
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:08 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:09 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.csv
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 56 centroid is now closest to src. 63
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 09:14:39 2012] Source is confused with source 63
[Wed Jul 11 17:23:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.81 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 11 17:23:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.81"
[Wed Jul 11 17:23:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.798
[Wed Jul 11 17:23:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 1, mean size = 11.81"
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:02 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.csv
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0136540801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 444.898000, observed total counts = 397.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 62
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Warning, spatial fit 43 centroid is now closest to src. 63
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 11 23:21:30 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0