[Tue Jun 26 10:39:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.9, 215.1) = 11 4 18.15 38 8 14.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 119.1 +/- 23.7
  Background counts = 212.3
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jun 26 10:39:14 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.28'
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.235
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 86 for pass 0, mean size = 9.57"
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src86.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:21 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src86 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source 87 is offset by 7.651945 and -4.838457 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.099766 x 1.099766, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.235
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 1, mean size = 9.57"
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3021.740000, observed total counts = 2457.000000
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 87
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2338.430000, observed total counts = 2296.000000
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 87 = 1.397657 pixels
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] 2371.470300 total counts/ 2274.370000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.036057
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 87 = 1.397657 pixels
  Position = (323.1, 214.3) = 11 4 17.72 38 8 9.0
  Extent = 8.3 (3.3-14.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 97.1 +/- 48.7
  Background counts = 2274.4
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.003
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9