[Tue Jun 26 10:39:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (324.8, 225.7) = 11 4 17.10 38 9 4.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 175.0 +/- 22.0
  Background counts = 239.8
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jun 26 10:39:14 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.61'
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.23 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.23"
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.727
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 83 for pass 0, mean size = 9.23"
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src83.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Warning: source 83 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 84 at 11.170584 pixels away
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source is confused with source 78
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.23 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.23"
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.727
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 1, mean size = 9.23"
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3629.760000, observed total counts = 3569.000000
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 84 = 0.291293 pixels
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 60 to 54
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] 3331.071100 total counts/ 3267.310000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.115477
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 84 = 0.291293 pixels
  Position = (324.6, 225.8) = 11 4 17.18 38 8 59.2
  Extent = 5.1" x 5.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 63.8 +/- 57.7
  Background counts = 3267.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability