[Tue Jun 26 10:39:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (261.3, 228.0) = 11 4 40.52 38 9 9.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 128.7 +/- 23.1
  Background counts = 205.2
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jun 26 10:39:14 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.77'
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.32"
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.075
[Tue Jun 26 10:45:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 81 for pass 0, mean size = 9.32"
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.csv
[Wed Jun 27 06:23:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src81.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Warning: source 71 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 82 at 11.667154 pixels away
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 81 centroid is now closest to src. 75
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.32"
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.075
[Wed Jun 27 09:21:56 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 9.32"
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Wed Jun 27 22:43:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0136540401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 58 centroid is now closest to src. 75
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 28 03:21:12 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0