[Tue Jul 3 14:57:14 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (321.4, 307.1) = 1 3 54.89 -72 0 47.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 126.1 +/- 19.3 Background counts = 24.6 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0008 [Tue Jul 3 14:57:14 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.78' [Tue Jul 3 15:54:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 3 15:54:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.32" [Tue Jul 3 15:54:38 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.787 [Tue Jul 3 15:54:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 7.32" [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 16:35:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly [Tue Jul 3 16:35:29 2012] Source 17 is offset by -3.350814 and -7.584183 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.729150 x 6.729150, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 3 16:35:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 3 16:35:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 3 16:35:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 3 16:35:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 3 16:35:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 3 17:06:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.32 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Jul 3 17:06:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.32" [Tue Jul 3 17:06:49 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.787 [Tue Jul 3 17:06:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 7.32" [Tue Jul 3 17:29:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 17:29:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 17:29:07 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly [Tue Jul 3 17:29:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 17:29:07 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Tue Jul 3 17:29:07 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0135721301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Source 17 is offset by 6.592083 and 5.874161 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 6.729150 x 4.475430, not incorporating fit results [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Jul 3 17:29:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9