[Sat Aug 11 01:02:27 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (288.5, 328.0) = 1 4 26.75 -71 59 10.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 64.2 +/- 11.8
  Background counts = 29.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sat Aug 11 01:02:28 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.26'
[Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.56"
[Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.899
[Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 0, mean size = 7.56"
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.csv
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.csv
[Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Source 9 is offset by -4.392314 and -7.994660 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.949425 x 6.949425, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.56 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.56"
[Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 18, frac = 0.899
[Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 7.56"
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Source 9 is offset by -1.926277 and -7.994660 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.949402 x 0.941664, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9