[Sat Aug 11 01:02:28 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (164.2, 242.1) = 1 6 24.00 -72 5 22.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 57.6 +/- 11.3 Background counts = 13.3 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sat Aug 11 01:02:28 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.55' [Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.71" [Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.835 [Sat Aug 11 01:14:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 11.71" [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 02:38:21 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly [Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Warning: source 22 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 12.594267 pixels away [Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Aug 11 03:13:20 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.71 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.71" [Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.835 [Sat Aug 11 03:16:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 11.71" [Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16 appears to have run properly [Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists [Sat Aug 11 03:43:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0135720801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16 appears to have run properly [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 10.133914 pixels away [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 3 [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Aug 11 04:19:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9