[Fri Aug 31 05:25:01 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (414.3, 338.9) = 1 1 40.34 -71 59 36.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 64.2 +/- 14.1 Background counts = 46.3 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009 [Fri Aug 31 05:25:01 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.89' [Fri Aug 31 05:27:16 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Aug 31 05:27:16 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.88" [Fri Aug 31 05:27:16 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.000 [Fri Aug 31 05:27:16 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 10.88" [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 07:12:34 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly [Fri Aug 31 08:05:14 2012] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 13.010029 pixels away [Fri Aug 31 08:05:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Aug 31 08:05:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Aug 31 08:05:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Aug 31 08:05:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Aug 31 08:05:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Aug 31 08:05:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.88 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Aug 31 08:05:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.88" [Fri Aug 31 08:05:26 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.000 [Fri Aug 31 08:05:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 1, mean size = 10.88" [Fri Aug 31 10:05:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 10:05:12 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 10:05:12 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src25 appears to have run properly [Fri Aug 31 10:05:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 10:05:13 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists [Fri Aug 31 10:05:13 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0135720601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src25 appears to have run properly [Fri Aug 31 11:24:33 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 294.978000, observed total counts = 305.000000 [Fri Aug 31 11:24:33 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 26 = 0.555535 pixels [Fri Aug 31 11:24:33 2012] 293.529800 total counts/ 266.864000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.632336 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 26 = 0.555535 pixels Position = (414.8, 338.9) = 1 1 39.83 -71 59 36.6 Extent = 20.4" x 4.5", rotation angle = 3 Source counts = 26.7 +/- 17.1 Background counts = 266.9 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.002 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability