[Mon Jul 9 10:09:30 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (291.4, 266.9) = 7 48 49.19 -67 45 25.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 43.5 +/- 10.0 Background counts = 5.4 Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001 [Mon Jul 9 10:09:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.34' [Mon Jul 9 12:18:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jul 9 12:18:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.60" [Mon Jul 9 12:18:12 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.990 [Mon Jul 9 12:18:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.60" [Mon Jul 9 13:14:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 13:14:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 13:14:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Jul 9 13:14:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 13:14:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 13:14:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Source 15 is offset by 6.339051 and -7.663882 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.495890 x 1.495890, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 10.498203 pixels away [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jul 9 13:15:05 2012] Source is confused with source 17 [Mon Jul 9 14:40:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon Jul 9 14:40:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.60" [Mon Jul 9 14:40:52 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.990 [Mon Jul 9 14:40:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 7.60" [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Mon Jul 9 15:00:03 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0134561101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Source 15 is offset by 6.345511 and -7.669928 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.481071 x 1.481071, not incorporating fit results [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon Jul 9 15:00:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8