[Sat Jul 21 21:53:39 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (167.5, 410.0) = 3 37 29.83 0 42 28.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.3 +/- 7.8
  Background counts = 4.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Sat Jul 21 21:53:40 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.47'
[Sun Jul 22 00:55:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 22 00:55:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66"
[Sun Jul 22 00:55:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 37, frac = 0.795
[Sun Jul 22 00:55:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 12.66"
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 119.511000, observed total counts = 72.000000
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 22 02:43:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 22 04:26:57 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.66 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jul 22 04:26:57 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.66"
[Sun Jul 22 04:26:57 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 37, frac = 0.795
[Sun Jul 22 04:26:57 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 12.66"
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134540101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 17.563864 pixels away
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jul 22 21:16:28 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8