[Wed Sep  5 12:17:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (301.0, 148.3) = 5 35 30.88 -5 18 12.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 97.4 +/- 13.5
  Background counts = 10.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006

[Wed Sep  5 12:17:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.89'
[Wed Sep  5 18:36:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Sep  5 18:36:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.87"
[Wed Sep  5 18:36:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 41, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.007
[Wed Sep  5 18:36:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 95 for pass 0, mean size = 11.87"
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:41 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:41 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.csv
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:41 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src95.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95_1.ximg exists
[Wed Sep  5 22:13:43 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src95 appears to have run properly
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 248.828000, observed total counts = 237.000000
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 151 = 0.730563 pixels
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] 249.708300 total counts/ 164.770000 bgd. counts: snr = 6.617051
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 151 = 0.730563 pixels
  Position = (300.4, 148.7) = 5 35 31.06 -5 18 11.5
  Extent = 8.6 (6.3-10.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 84.9 +/- 15.8
  Background counts = 164.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Sep  5 22:14:44 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Sep  6 04:38:06 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Sep  6 04:38:06 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.62"
[Thu Sep  6 04:38:06 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.016
[Thu Sep  6 04:38:06 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 92 for pass 1, mean size = 8.62"
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src92 appears to have run properly
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg exists
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.csv
[Thu Sep  6 07:18:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0134531601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src92.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 242.775000, observed total counts = 222.000000
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 151 = 0.146845 pixels
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] 246.483400 total counts/ 215.993000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.074643
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 151 = 0.146845 pixels
  Position = (300.5, 148.6) = 5 35 31.03 -5 18 12.0
  Extent = 5.9" x 0.9", rotation angle = 91
  Source counts = 30.5 +/- 15.7
  Background counts = 216.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0007
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 6.39
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Thu Sep  6 07:19:32 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9