[Mon Jun  4 04:45:18 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.4, 347.5) = 5 59 43.15 -50 21 31.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 49.9 +/- 9.0
  Background counts = 5.0
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Mon Jun  4 04:45:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.60'
[Mon Jun  4 04:58:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.23 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  4 04:58:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.23"
[Mon Jun  4 04:58:26 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 24, frac = 1.049
[Mon Jun  4 04:58:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 8.23"
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 05:27:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun  4 05:46:40 2012] Source 13 is offset by 7.957908 and -2.384243 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.946391 x 0.946391, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun  4 05:46:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  4 05:46:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  4 05:46:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  4 05:46:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  4 05:46:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  4 06:02:54 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.23 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun  4 06:02:54 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.23"
[Mon Jun  4 06:02:54 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 24, frac = 1.049
[Mon Jun  4 06:02:54 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 8.23"
[Mon Jun  4 06:18:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 06:18:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 06:18:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun  4 06:18:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 06:18:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun  4 06:18:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0129360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 13 at 10.800610 pixels away
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun  4 06:19:33 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8