[Fri May 17 07:15:50 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (337.4, 290.3) = 5 24 31.39 -69 38 8.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.8 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 65.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0007

[Fri May 17 07:15:50 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.89'
[Sat May 18 01:48:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 18 01:48:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87"
[Sat May 18 01:48:43 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.984
[Sat May 18 01:48:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 7.87"
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Sat May 18 03:41:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 18 03:42:06 2013] Source 14 is offset by 7.685737 and -2.998546 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.904920 x 7.239357, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 18 03:42:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 18 03:42:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 18 03:42:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 18 03:42:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 18 03:42:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 19 20:46:38 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 19 20:46:38 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.87"
[Sun May 19 20:46:38 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.984
[Sun May 19 20:46:38 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.87"
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Mon May 20 07:28:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0129341701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Source 14 is offset by 7.216427 and 6.410028 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.081568 x 1.081568, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 20 07:28:28 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8