[Sat Jun 15 00:48:32 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (338.8, 324.3) = 5 24 42.73 -69 36 45.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 237.3 +/- 43.4
  Background counts = 172.9
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun 15 00:48:36 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.48'
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:14 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.973
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 8.17"
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:16 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10 appears to have run properly
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:19 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Source 11 is offset by 0.856938 and 8.968593 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.539908 x 6.539908, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 00:49:44 2013] Source is confused with source 7
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:09 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.973
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 8.17"
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Sat Jun 15 00:50:11 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0129341501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Source 11 is offset by 1.438777 and 8.968593 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.742391 x 5.742391, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 7
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 15 02:25:14 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0