[Tue Aug 28 05:58:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (255.7, 321.9) = 5 25 18.16 -69 37 1.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 105.5 +/- 18.2
  Background counts = 31.2
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Tue Aug 28 05:58:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.53'
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.20"
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.880
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 8.20"
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10 appears to have run properly
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source 9 is offset by -7.127940 and 6.435187 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.190299 x 5.190299, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = -31.708900, observed total counts = 759.000000
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9