[Tue Aug 28 05:58:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (257.8, 290.8) = 5 25 16.51 -69 39 15.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 154.8 +/- 24.0
  Background counts = 38.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Tue Aug 28 05:58:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.00'
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.93"
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.066
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 7.93"
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source is confused with source 5
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.93 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.93"
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 23, frac = 1.066
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 7.93"
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2440.170000, observed total counts = 5095.000000
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8