[Tue Aug 28 05:58:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (254.9, 294.9) = 5 25 18.89 -69 39 0.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 155.4 +/- 23.5
  Background counts = 36.7
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Tue Aug 28 05:58:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.17'
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.01"
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.684
[Tue Aug 28 13:09:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 8.01"
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Aug 28 20:18:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 28 20:22:51 2012] Source is confused with source 6
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.01"
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.684
[Wed Aug 29 00:48:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 8.01"
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Wed Aug 29 18:51:28 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0129341101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 11.527521 pixels away
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug 29 18:56:04 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8