[Mon Jun 11 13:01:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (201.6, 289.6) = 5 27 52.65 -69 37 5.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 38.0 +/- 9.5
  Background counts = 26.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Mon Jun 11 13:01:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.05'
[Mon Jun 11 13:03:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.96 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 11 13:03:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.96"
[Mon Jun 11 13:03:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.675
[Mon Jun 11 13:03:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 0, mean size = 9.96"
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:57 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src58 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:58 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.csv
[Mon Jun 11 17:55:58 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0125100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src58.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Source 58 is offset by 0.882953 and 3.354042 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.372887 x 1.372887, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Warning: source 58 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 58 at 14.667052 pixels away
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 12 00:20:39 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7