[Tue May 14 04:06:32 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (419.4, 197.1) = 12 59 24.05 27 22 24.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 92.4 +/- 17.5
  Background counts = 63.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Tue May 14 04:06:43 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.44'
[Tue May 14 04:07:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 04:07:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.15"
[Tue May 14 04:07:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.968
[Tue May 14 04:07:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 0, mean size = 12.15"
[Tue May 14 04:07:42 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:07:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv
[Tue May 14 04:07:42 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:07:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv
[Tue May 14 04:07:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 14 04:07:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:07:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:07:45 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Warning, spatial fit 65 centroid is now closest to src. 54
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 14 04:08:31 2013] Source is confused with source 54
[Tue May 14 04:08:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 14 04:08:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.15"
[Tue May 14 04:08:58 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.968
[Tue May 14 04:08:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 1, mean size = 12.15"
[Tue May 14 04:09:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:09:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:09:01 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 14 04:09:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:09:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 14 04:09:04 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0124710401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 14 04:09:52 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1783.050000, observed total counts = 1772.000000
[Tue May 14 04:09:52 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 61 = 0.751523 pixels
[Tue May 14 04:09:52 2013] 1780.267600 total counts/ 1745.360000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.835560
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 61 = 0.751523 pixels
  Position = (418.8, 197.4) = 12 59 24.27 27 22 22.7
  Extent = 6.6 (3.0-21.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 34.9 +/- 42.2
  Background counts = 1745.4
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.005
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability