[Fri Sep  7 22:10:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (309.3, 336.4) = 7 44 3.92 74 35 2.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 110.0 +/- 21.5
  Background counts = 73.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Sep  7 22:10:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.87'
[Fri Sep  7 23:31:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep  7 23:31:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.86"
[Fri Sep  7 23:31:10 2012] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.939
[Fri Sep  7 23:31:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 7.86"
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Fri Sep  7 23:59:16 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0123100101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1038.420000, observed total counts = 2507.000000
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 14
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1086.980000, observed total counts = 1125.000000
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 1.041194 pixels
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 14 to 17
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] 1062.640600 total counts/ 964.512000 bgd. counts: snr = 3.159670
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 1.041194 pixels
  Position = (309.8, 335.5) = 7 44 3.39 74 34 58.6
  Extent = 16.3 (12.9-32.6)" x 2.6 (2.0-4.6)", rotation angle = 1 (355-6) degrees
  Source counts = 98.1 +/- 32.6
  Background counts = 964.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 2.82
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Sat Sep  8 00:36:58 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9