[Fri Aug 17 08:17:32 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (298.9, 351.5) = 18 32 47.68 -10 30 37.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 46.1 +/- 10.1
  Background counts = 18.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Fri Aug 17 08:17:32 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.85'
[Fri Aug 17 10:10:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 10:10:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.35"
[Fri Aug 17 10:10:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.067
[Fri Aug 17 10:10:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 8.35"
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:34 2012] Source 12 is offset by -7.109422 and 6.484085 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.960931 x 0.960931, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 11:30:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 17 14:33:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.35 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 17 14:33:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.35"
[Fri Aug 17 14:33:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.067
[Fri Aug 17 14:33:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 8.35"
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21 appears to have run properly
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Fri Aug 17 15:46:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0122700301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Warning: source 7 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 94.511382 pixels away
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 129.955000, observed total counts = 142.000000
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.439125 pixels
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] 127.238400 total counts/ 87.821600 bgd. counts: snr = 4.206111
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 12 = 0.439125 pixels
  Position = (299.2, 351.2) = 18 32 47.59 -10 30 37.1
  Extent = 10.5" x 4.2", rotation angle = 24
  Source counts = 39.4 +/- 11.3
  Background counts = 87.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0004
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 2.51
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Fri Aug 17 15:47:06 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9