[Sat Jun 9 09:55:47 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (403.6, 310.1) = 5 34 3.39 22 0 17.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 139.8 +/- 28.9 Background counts = 370.4 Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.002 [Sat Jun 9 09:55:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.67' [Sat Jun 9 21:28:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 9 21:28:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.27" [Sat Jun 9 21:28:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.917 [Sat Jun 9 21:28:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 10.27" [Sun Jun 10 08:07:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 08:07:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Sun Jun 10 08:07:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 08:07:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Sun Jun 10 08:07:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 08:08:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 08:08:03 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 08:08:03 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 89 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Source is confused with source 89 [Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.27" [Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.917 [Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 84 for pass 1, mean size = 10.27"