[Sat Jun  9 09:55:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (292.3, 395.9) = 5 34 38.22 22 6 32.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 587.5 +/- 34.2
  Background counts = 335.9
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 09:55:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.08'
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.97"
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:13 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.802
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 9.97"
[Sun Jun 10 08:07:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 08:07:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sun Jun 10 08:07:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 08:07:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sun Jun 10 08:07:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 57
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:51 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.97"
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.802
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 9.97"