[Sat Jun 9 09:54:46 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (407.4, 375.1) = 5 34 2.20 22 4 59.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 169.7 +/- 25.2 Background counts = 214.9 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Sat Jun 9 09:54:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.66' [Sat Jun 9 10:08:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 9 10:08:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.26" [Sat Jun 9 10:08:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.839 [Sat Jun 9 10:08:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 79 for pass 0, mean size = 11.26" [Sat Jun 9 21:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79.ximg exists [Sat Jun 9 21:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 9 21:28:09 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src79 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 9 21:28:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79.ximg exists [Sat Jun 9 21:28:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 9 21:28:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src79 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 79 centroid is now closest to src. 80 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source is confused with source 78 [Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source is confused with source 81 [Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.26" [Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.839 [Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 74 for pass 1, mean size = 11.26" [Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.csv [Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.csv [Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src74.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src74 appears to have run properly