[Sat Jun  9 09:54:46 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (384.0, 398.1) = 5 34 9.52 22 6 43.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 161.8 +/- 23.6
  Background counts = 171.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat Jun  9 09:54:48 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.52'
[Sat Jun  9 10:08:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun  9 10:08:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.19"
[Sat Jun  9 10:08:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.927
[Sat Jun  9 10:08:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 11.19"
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:09 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:09 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:09 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:12 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Sat Jun  9 21:28:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 69 centroid is now closest to src. 76
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source 73 is offset by -0.374280 and 3.444959 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.330492 x 1.330492, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 10 08:08:31 2012] Source is confused with source 65
[Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.19"
[Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 35, frac = 0.927
[Sun Jun 10 08:09:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 1, mean size = 11.19"
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.csv
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.csv
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Sun Jun 10 17:44:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0122330801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes