[Wed Jul 25 20:39:37 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (393.4, 370.3) = 5 16 36.85 46 4 39.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 45.9 +/- 9.8
  Background counts = 14.9
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Wed Jul 25 20:39:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.63'
[Thu Jul 26 03:21:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 26 03:21:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.74"
[Thu Jul 26 03:21:15 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.020
[Thu Jul 26 03:21:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 10.74"
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.csv
[Thu Jul 26 06:11:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 26 06:12:03 2012] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 2 at 14.155825 pixels away
[Thu Jul 26 06:12:04 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul 26 06:12:04 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul 26 06:12:04 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul 26 06:12:04 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul 26 06:12:04 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul 26 11:18:21 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul 26 11:18:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.74"
[Thu Jul 26 11:18:21 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.020
[Thu Jul 26 11:18:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 1, mean size = 10.74"
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.csv
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:21 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0121500301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 183.715000, observed total counts = 151.000000
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul 26 14:42:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0