[Thu May 31 19:36:22 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (421.4, 448.2) = 5 38 52.69 -69 9 29.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 68.9 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 31.6
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Thu May 31 19:36:22 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.05'
[Thu May 31 19:38:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 31 19:38:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.45"
[Thu May 31 19:38:07 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.814
[Thu May 31 19:38:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 13.45"
[Thu May 31 21:59:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 21:59:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu May 31 21:59:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 21:59:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu May 31 21:59:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 31 21:59:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 21:59:08 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 31 21:59:08 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 821.364000, observed total counts = 720.000000
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 31 22:52:59 2012] Source is confused with source 23
[Thu May 31 22:53:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 31 22:53:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.45"
[Thu May 31 22:53:12 2012] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.814
[Thu May 31 22:53:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 13.45"
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Fri Jun  1 01:35:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 24 at 14.370235 pixels away
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2173.730000, observed total counts = 1937.000000
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 24
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 23
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun  1 02:15:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun  1 02:16:04 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(36613.331329, 38942.495605, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun  1 02:16:04 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src.reg
[Fri Jun  1 02:16:04 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (384, 411) - (459, 486)
[Fri Jun  1 02:16:04 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(36613.331329, 38942.495605, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37828.623199, 38143.037079, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37648.033417, 38664.933533, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35981.974000, 39237.466000, 2152.344062, 2152.344062, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38696.916400, 35870.150200, 1159.896033, 1159.896033, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun  1 02:16:04 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24.gif
[Fri Jun  1 02:45:06 2012] Mean detx,y = (302.10, -15279.70) 
[Fri Jun  1 02:45:08 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Jun  1 02:45:21 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Jun  1 02:45:21 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jun  1 02:45:21 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri Jun  1 04:09:01 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 68 counts
[Fri Jun  1 04:09:01 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Fri Jun  1 05:25:54 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Fri Jun  1 05:25:55 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jun  1 05:25:55 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Fri Jun  1 05:25:55 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00669, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0117510201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24.arf
[Fri Jun  1 05:25:55 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Fri Jun  1 05:25:55 2012] Updating source flux to 7.1e-14
[Fri Jun  1 05:26:29 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting