[Tue Jul 31 10:18:01 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (333.0, 332.9) = 16 35 38.25 66 14 19.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.0 +/- 12.7
  Background counts = 31.7
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jul 31 10:18:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.54'
[Tue Jul 31 10:21:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 10:21:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.20"
[Tue Jul 31 10:21:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.880
[Tue Jul 31 10:21:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 8.20"
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 31 12:33:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2030.590000, observed total counts = 1737.000000
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 3
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Source 13 is offset by -0.494280 and 2.327410 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.943563 x 0.943563, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.20 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.20"
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:38 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.880
[Tue Jul 31 17:13:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 8.20"
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:43:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Source 13 is offset by 7.166938 and 5.648651 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.942092 x 0.942092, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 22:23:37 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9