[Thu Jul  5 11:27:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (279.6, 309.1) = 16 36 16.13 66 12 29.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 79.1 +/- 16.7
  Background counts = 93.8
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Thu Jul  5 11:27:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.57'
[Thu Jul  5 11:29:26 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul  5 11:29:26 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.21"
[Thu Jul  5 11:29:26 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.073
[Thu Jul  5 11:29:26 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 7.21"
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:38 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:38 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu Jul  5 12:13:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1404.480000, observed total counts = 1098.000000
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Source 18 is offset by 2.679437 and 4.210791 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.800253 x 0.800253, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:01 2012] Source is confused with source 19
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:22 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.21 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:22 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.21"
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:22 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.073
[Thu Jul  5 14:52:22 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 7.21"
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Thu Jul  5 15:48:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112980401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 19
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul  5 18:09:06 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9