[Tue Mar 6 09:01:06 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (195.7, 335.9) = 17 43 57.36 -29 43 22.6 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 75.3 +/- 15.6 Background counts = 45.6 Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.002 [Tue Mar 6 09:01:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.93' [Tue Mar 6 20:20:14 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 6 20:20:14 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.39" [Tue Mar 6 20:20:14 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.078 [Tue Mar 6 20:20:14 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 0, mean size = 10.39" [Tue Mar 6 23:31:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 23:31:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 23:31:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src7 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 6 23:31:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 23:31:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 23:31:37 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2562.670000, observed total counts = 5381.000000 [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Source 12 is offset by 2.448749 and 6.688979 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.194524 x 1.194524, not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 10.854271 pixels away [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 6 23:32:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 7 11:58:48 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 7 11:58:48 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.39" [Wed Mar 7 11:58:48 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.078 [Wed Mar 7 11:58:48 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 10.39" [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 13:09:57 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112971801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 3 [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 7 13:10:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9