[Fri Aug 10 22:34:46 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (303.3, 422.8) = 17 46 28.21 -28 43 33.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.8 +/- 13.8
  Background counts = 40.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Fri Aug 10 22:34:47 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.03'
[Sat Aug 11 02:42:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 11 02:42:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.94"
[Sat Aug 11 02:42:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.990
[Sat Aug 11 02:42:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 10.94"
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:06 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Source 17 is offset by -8.193278 and 3.941804 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.008704 x 4.008704, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 11 04:01:41 2012] Source is confused with source 16
[Sat Aug 11 08:11:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.94 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 11 08:11:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.94"
[Sat Aug 11 08:11:25 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.990
[Sat Aug 11 08:11:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 10.94"
[Sat Aug 11 09:20:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 09:20:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Sat Aug 11 09:20:59 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 09:20:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Sat Aug 11 09:20:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21 appears to have run properly
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Warning: source 21 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 17 at 11.483059 pixels away
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 11 09:21:21 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8