[Mon Jul  9 08:44:16 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (297.4, 234.7) = 17 46 14.26 -28 44 41.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 83.3 +/- 16.7
  Background counts = 76.0
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Mon Jul  9 08:44:16 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.62'
[Mon Jul  9 11:58:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  9 11:58:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.74"
[Mon Jul  9 11:58:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.993
[Mon Jul  9 11:58:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 0, mean size = 8.74"
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:42 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src10 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:43 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Mon Jul  9 13:11:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 13:12:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Mon Jul  9 13:12:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  9 13:12:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  9 13:12:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  9 13:12:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  9 13:12:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.74 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.74"
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.993
[Mon Jul  9 17:49:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 8.74"
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112970401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Warning: source 5 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 12.719710 pixels away
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Source 14 is offset by -6.382094 and -3.864951 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 4.426009 x 8.035678, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Source 14 is offset by -6.806513 and 6.735606 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.027857 x 6.853755, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jul  9 18:41:27 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9