[Tue Jul 31 10:06:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (305.4, 346.0) = 13 47 30.82 -11 43 16.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.3 +/- 12.2
  Background counts = 26.9
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jul 31 10:06:29 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.48'
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.575
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 8.17"
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:19 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 16:53:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Tue Jul 31 16:53:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 16:53:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 16:53:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 16:53:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 16:53:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.17"
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.575
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 8.17"
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Source 18 is offset by -7.070901 and -6.491777 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.648658 x 2.648658, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:55 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9