[Tue Jul 31 10:05:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (257.0, 213.2) = 13 47 45.18 -11 52 52.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 65.2 +/- 10.7
  Background counts = 14.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Jul 31 10:05:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.87'
[Tue Jul 31 14:03:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 14:03:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.87"
[Tue Jul 31 14:03:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.142
[Tue Jul 31 14:03:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 9.87"
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Jul 31 15:23:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 178.222000, observed total counts = 150.000000
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 18
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 16:52:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 20:10:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.87 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 20:10:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.87"
[Tue Jul 31 20:10:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 35, frac = 1.142
[Tue Jul 31 20:10:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 9.87"
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Tue Jul 31 20:58:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 18 at 12.164242 pixels away
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 21:34:53 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9