[Sun Sep 2 06:05:27 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (443.9, 215.2) = 17 4 55.74 78 37 42.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 187.2 +/- 24.5 Background counts = 136.9 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Sun Sep 2 06:05:28 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.15' [Sun Sep 2 06:06:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Sep 2 06:06:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.50" [Sun Sep 2 06:06:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 41, frac = 0.900 [Sun Sep 2 06:06:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 12.50" [Sun Sep 2 07:19:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 07:19:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Sun Sep 2 07:19:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 07:19:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv [Sun Sep 2 07:19:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Sep 2 07:19:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 07:19:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Sun Sep 2 07:19:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 07:19:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv [Sun Sep 2 07:19:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 14 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Source 7 is offset by -4.038142 and -2.775980 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.433416 x 1.433416, not incorporating fit results [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Source is confused with source 9 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:34 2012] Source is confused with source 13 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.50 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Sep 2 07:33:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.50" [Sun Sep 2 07:33:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 45, mask sum = 41, frac = 0.900 [Sun Sep 2 07:33:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 12.50" [Sun Sep 2 13:09:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 13:09:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv [Sun Sep 2 13:09:17 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 13:09:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv [Sun Sep 2 13:09:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Sep 2 13:09:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 13:09:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv [Sun Sep 2 13:09:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists [Sun Sep 2 13:09:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv [Sun Sep 2 13:09:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Warning, spatial fit 4 centroid is now closest to src. 12 [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 7 at 27.497466 pixels away [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 13175.200000, observed total counts = 9401.000000 [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Source 7 is offset by -4.038142 and -2.775980 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.433416 x 1.433416, not incorporating fit results [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Sep 2 13:25:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Sep 2 13:26:04 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(38573.337677, 18673.145706, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Sep 2 13:26:04 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src.reg [Sun Sep 2 13:26:04 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (406, 178) - (481, 253) [Sun Sep 2 13:26:04 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(38573.337677, 18673.145706, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40186.493652, 21660.228897, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(40000.474335, 20677.111374, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39386.631561, 20562.006561, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37531.767029, 18309.847427, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38456.261505, 18065.801117, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(39879.104980, 21053.522842, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38977.146393, 20133.849899, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(38352.323000, 19480.558000, 1952.544056, 1952.544056, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37548.680800, 18973.471600, 894.216026, 894.216026, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37984.760162, 17877.109512, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(37805.078400, 21070.902664, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Sep 2 13:26:04 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7.gif [Sun Sep 2 13:28:13 2012] Mean detx,y = (13403.55, 1941.11) [Sun Sep 2 13:28:15 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun Sep 2 13:28:32 2012] grppha failed [Sun Sep 2 13:28:32 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src.pi.gz [Sun Sep 2 13:28:32 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_bgd.pi.gz [Sun Sep 2 13:38:11 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun Sep 2 13:38:11 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sun Sep 2 13:42:40 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sun Sep 2 13:42:40 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_src.pi.gz [Sun Sep 2 13:42:40 2012] No arf file for this source, not re-computing flux [Sun Sep 2 13:42:43 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Sun Sep 2 13:42:44 2012] xmm0112951601/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0112951601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src7_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete